COMPREHENSIVE CRIMINOLOGY: A HEURISTIC PERSPECTIVE ON PARTICIPATION AND PLURALITY IN GROUP AND ORGANIZED CRIME
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10419698Keywords:
Comprehensive Criminology, Heuristic Perspective, Participation and Plurality, Subjective Criminal Intent, articipant Roles (Perpetrators, Accomplices, Instigators), Mens Rea Regit Actum, Psychosociological Aspects of Group Formation, Group Effect, Group Typology, Criminal Subculture, Crowd, Group or Association, Band, Criminal Organization, Triadic Analytical Matrix, Leadership in Criminal Group, Transnational Criminal Organizations, Discordant Socialization, Societal ContextsAbstract
Comprehensive Criminology: A Heuristic Perspective on Participation and Plurality in Group and Organized Crime.
“COMPREHENSIVE CRIMINOLOGY” elaborated by George C. Basiliade ( Comprehensive Criminology, EXPERT Publishing House, 2006, 903 pages, Romanian Academy Ward, 2006) represents not only an encyclopedic treatise, unique in the Romanian specialized literature but also an original conception of the epistemology of crime, unique in the European and global criminological research. Unfortunately, this work is still remaining insufficiently known and barely integrated in the circuit of academic values. Our present analytical approach is proposing to introduce Basiliade’s outstanding contribution regarding the heuristic perspective on participation and plurality in group and organized crime. He defines participation as how multiple individuals act in the commission of one or more offenses, emphasizing both subjective criminal intent and the roles of participants. Basiliade distinguishes between perpetrators, accomplices, and instigators, each with their unique roles in criminal acts. Perpetrators directly execute criminal actions, accomplices intentionally aid or abet offenses, and instigators induce others to commit crimes. These roles create a comprehensive understanding of objective involvement in criminal acts. Basiliade’s perspective places a significant emphasis on the subjective element of intent, especially in cases of association for the commission of offenses. In such cases, the central element is the participants’ pre-existing understanding and agreement to commit crimes together. This subjective aspect holds greater weight than the objective element, aligning with the principle “Mens rea regit actum.” He also explores the psychosociological aspects of group formation, highligh ting how groups organize to achieve common goals. The group exerts pressure on individuals to conform to its norms and values, leading to internalization of these norms—a phenomenon known as the “group effect.” Basiliade analyzes the work of Didier Anzieu and Jacques-Yves Martin on group typology and questions its relevance in criminology, suggesting that distinctions between various types of pluralities are vague and may lead to confusion. Ultimately, Basiliade defines a plurality of individuals as a group formed with a specific purpose, distinguished from a crowd. He argues that understanding the purpose, cohesion, and communication within a group is essential for differentiating between various forms of pluralities, including organized crime groups. In this extensive sociological analysis, Romanian criminologist George Basiliade categorizes various types of pluralities constituted by individuals based on criteria such as purpose, cohesion, and communication. He proposes a classification that includes the following categories:
A. The Crowd:
- 1. A crowd as a large number of individuals participating in collective actions with a common but diffuse purpose.
- 2. An amorphous crowd with no common purpose or cohesion. Basiliade emphasizes that crowds become of criminological interest when their actions primarily involve committing common law crimes.
B. The Group or Association:
- Formed by individuals with structured and temporary character, aiming at common objectives. It can be of criminological interest when formed to commit crimes.
C. The Group:
- A structured plurality of individuals with distinct identity based on various criteria, including values, norms, and communication. It becomes relevant in criminology when it commits crimes or engages in anti-social activities.
D. Band:
- A criminal group with an autocratic structure, rigid norms, and a focus on antisocial purposes.
E. Criminal Organization:
- A structured association of individuals with predetermined goals and a system of rules. It may involve simple or complex organizations, and it becomes of criminological interest when engaged in criminal activities.
Basiliade highlights that criminal organizations often have a transnational character and are distinct from other forms of organized crime. The criminologist employs a triadic analytical matrix to analyze these categories based on purpose, cohesion, and communication. He notes that these factors play a crucial role in determining the dynamics of these pluralities and their criminal activities. Basiliade also discusses the role of leaders in these groups and how their authority is established based on their influence and activity within the criminal context. In conclusion, Basiliade argues that these various forms of pluralities, especially criminal groups and organizations, represent environments where participants undergo discordant socialization, ultimately forming a criminal subculture. This analysis provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and studying criminal behaviors within different societal contexts.
References
• ANZIEU, D. ; J.Y.Martin, La dynamique des groups restreints, 3-eme edition, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1976.
• BASILIADE, George et colab., Ancheta socială în sistemul probațiunii judiciare, Consfatuire Natională de Medicină Legală, 1964.
• BASILIADE, George et colab., Corelațiile dintre laturile subiective și obiective ale infracțiunii și nivelul mental la un grup de delincvenți minori, Uniunea Societăților Științelor Medicale, Secția de Medicină Legală, 26 ianuarie, 1966.
• BASILIADE, George, «De la sanction repressive a la sanction rehabilitante» (Comunicare) Al IX-lea Congres mondial de Filozofie Socială și de Filozofia Dreptului, Basel, 1979.
• BASILIADE, George, “Examenul personalității infractorului minor și problema orientării profesionale”, Revista de Pedagogie, nr.11/1966.
• BASILIADE, George, Cauze ale fenomenului infracțional în randul tineretului. Sinteza cercetărilor efectuate în perioada 1969-1971, Centrul de Cercetări pentru Problemele Tineretului.
• BASILIADE, George, Criminologie Comprehensivă, Partea a Patra, Capitolul 5 “Repere calitative pentru o analiza morfologica a criminalitatii, subcapitolul 5 “Participatia si pluritatea de infractori”, Editura Expert, 2006, pp. 662-675.
• BASILIADE, George, Unele probleme ale cercetării criminologice a delincvenților minori, Uniunea Societăților de Științe Medicale, Secția de Medicină Legală, 1964.
• BOTESCU, George-Mircea, “Supravegherea - dimensiune a controlului social în postmodernitate. Virtuți și riscuri pentru libertatea și demnitatea umană”, Jurnalul Libertății de Conștiință, vol.7, nr.1, 2019, Editions IARSIC, 2019.
• BOTESCU, George-Mircea, “Comprehensive criminology - a teleological and hermeneutical perspective on criminal behaviours”, Jurnalul Libertății de Conștiință, vol.9, NR.2, Editions IARSIC, 2021.
• BOTESCU, George-Mircea, “Comprehensive criminology. A reflective and Christian approach to the rationalist paradigm of free will”, Jurnalul Libertății de Conștiință, vol.10, nr. 1, Editions IARSIC, 2022.
• BOTESCU, George-Mircea, “Criminologia integrativă și dimensiunea noologică (Integrative Criminology and the Noological Dimension”, Jurnalul Libertății de Conștiință, vol.8, nr.1, Editions IARSIC, 2020.
• BUZARNESCU, Ștefan, Doctrine sociologice comparate, Timișoara, Editura de Vest, 2008.
• CIOCLEI, Valerian, Manual de Criminologie, București, Editura ALL BECK, 1998.
• ELSTER, Jon, Comportamentul social. Fundamentele explicației în stiintele sociale, București, Editura ALL, 2013.
• FREDA, Adler, Gerhardt O.V. Mueller, William S. Laufer, Criminology (second edition).
• GIDDENS, Anthony, Sociology, 8th Edition, Polity Press, 2017.
• INNES, Martin, Understanding social control. Deviance, crime and social order, Open University Press, 2003.
• LEAH, E. Daigle, Victimology. A text reader, Sage, 2012.
• LECLERC, M., Avant-propos. La criminalite organisee, Paris, La Documentation Francaise, 1996.
• MONET, J.C., Introduction. La criminalite organisee, Paris, La Documentation Francaise, 1996.
• ROBERT, Ph., Les bandes d’adolescents, Paris, Les Editions Ouvrieres, 1966.
• SHORT, J.F. Jr.; F.L. Strodtbeck, Group Process and Gang Delinquency, The University of Chicago Press, 1965.
• The Sage Book of Criminological Theory, edited by Eugene McLaughlin and Tim Newburn, 2010.
