CRIMINOLOGIA INTEGRATIVĂ ȘI DIMENSIUNEA NOOLOGICĂ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6387698Keywords:
integrative criminology, development theory, life course theory, reciprocity theory, antisocial behavior, noologyAbstract
Integrative Criminology and the Noological Dimension
As criminologist Gregg Barak argued, integrative criminology means different things to different criminologists. Viewed comprehensively, the multiple strengths of investigations, examinations and incorporations constitute integrative criminology. The same researcher considers that informal and formal integration currently consists of the convergence of at least three recent theoretical forces within the criminological enterprise: the „development”, „life course” and „reciprocal” theories of human behavior. All these theories have common integrative approaches to the individual problem of relating the environment and how these experiences establish paths to and / or away from antisocial behavior, deviance, delinquency, crime or violence. We believe and try to argue that this triad of integrative criminological theories is an open system that must be linked to the „noological model” of social interaction, originally created by Ilie Badescu, a Romanian sociologist, in a comprehensive monograph entitled Noological Sociology. The spiritual order of society. We consider that between these two types of approach there is harmony, complementarity and completeness,
and the noological approach is able to multiply the integrative capacity of
the criminological vision.
References
Barak, Gregg, Integrative Criminology, articol publicat în volumul The Sage Handbook of Criminological Theory, pag. 174-192, 2010.
Barak, Gregg, Violence and Nonviolence: Pathways to Understanding, 2003.
Barak, Gregg, The Essential Criminology Reader, 2006.
Bădescu Ilie, Sociologia Noologică. Ordinea Spirituală a Societății. Strat și Substrat Sufletesc, Editura, Mica Valahie, București, 2007.
Colvin, Mark, Crime and Coercion: An integrated Theory of Chronic Criminal, pag.1, New York: St. Martin, 2000.
Lilly J., Culen F. și Ball R (coord.), Criminology Theory: Context and Consequences, pag.118, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2007.
Maruna, Shaad, Making Good:How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild their lives; American Psyhological Association, 2001.
Moffit, T., Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy; in A. Piquero si P. Mazerolle, Life-Course Criminology: Contemporary and Classic Readings p. 91-145, Belmont, CA:Wadsworth, 2000.
Nistor-Filip, Otilia Elena, Criminalitatea Organizată, o interpretare sociologică, lucrare de doctorat, 2012.
Patterson, DeBarshty și Ramsey, A developmental perspective on antisocial behaviour, American Psihologist, 44: 329/1989.
Patterson, G. și Yoerger K., A Developmental model for late-onset delinquency in Motivation on Delinquency, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Vol. 44, pag.119-177. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press, 1997.
Regoli si Hiwitt, Deliquency and Society, third edition, McGraw-Hill, 1997.
Sampsom, Robert și John Laub, A life course theory of cumulative disadvantaje and the stability of the delinquency; Life Course Criminology: Contemporary and Classic Readings, pag. 146-170. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth,1997.
Sampson și Laub, Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Deliquency and Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
Thornberry, Terence, Empirical support for interactional theory: a review of the literature, Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories, pag. 198-235, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
