ABOLISHMENT OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN EUROPE. STUDY CASE: BELARUS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6436263Keywords:
right to life, death penalty, abolition, human rights, Council of Europe, European Convention on Human Rights, Belarus, moratoriumAbstract
The right to life is considered by both the international doctrine and the universal and regional international treaties in the field of fundamental human rights and liberties as being the first among all these fundamental human rights and liberties, an essential principle among the core rights because inter alia it represents the foundation for the enjoyment of all the other human rights. The right to life is an intangible and inalienable right of the human being. As a consequence, this core of fundamental values which must be common to all nations, states and individuals may not be derogated from. The right to life, as well as the prohibition against torture and the violation of human dignity are included by the international doctrine within this category. The European standards on the protection of the right to life and the abolishment of death penalty respectively are established by the Council of Europe through first of all the legal foundation consecrated y the European Convention on Human Rights, its Protocols 6 and 13 and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. The Council of Europe qualifies the death penalty as cruel, inhumane and degrading. It is against human rights and is a symptom of a culture marked by violence. Moreover, there is no evidence that capital punishment deters crime. Regardless of the gravity of the offence and the public interest in imposing a proportionate sanction, European democratic standards prohibit the use of the death penalty in all circumstances. Currently, Belarus is the only state on the European continent that still carries out executions in its territory. Therefore, the goal to introduce a moratorium on the death penalty as soon as possible and to consider its full abolition in the future it is a zero priority for the Council of Europe.
References
• Jacobs, White& Ovey, The European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford University Press, sixth edition, Oxford/ United Kingdom, 2014, p. 143.
• Jean-Francois Rennuci, Traite de droit europeen des droits de l’home, L.G.D.J., 2e edition, Paris, 2012, p. 89.
• Malcom N. Shaw, International Law, Cambridge University Press, sixth edition, New York, 2010, p. 274.
• Martin Scheinin, „Core rights and obligations”, in The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, edited by Dinah Shelton, Oxford University Press, Oxford/ United Kingdom, 2015, p. 527.
• Olivier de Schutter, International Human Rights Law, Cambridge University Press, second edition, Cambridge/ United Kingdom, 2015, pp. 583-584.
• Philip Alston, Ryan Goodman, International Human Rights, The successor to International human rights in context, Oxford University Press, Oxford. United Kingdom, 2013, p. 163.
• Titus Corlatean, Protectia europeana si internationala a Drepturilor Omului, Universul juridic, revised second edition revizuita, Bucharest, 2015, p. 59.
• Amnesty International Global Report, Death sentences and executions 2018, https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/ACT5098702019ENGLISH.PDF
• Chart of signatures and ratifications of Treaty 114- Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty, Status as of 21/09/2019; https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/114/signatures?p_auth=Ty4c3QRF
• Chart of signatures and ratifications of Treaty 187- Protocol No. 13 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, concerning the abolition of the death penalty in all circumstances, https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/187/signatures
• European Convention on Human Rights; https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
• International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights from December 19, 1966, https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%20999/volume-999-i-14668-english.pdf
• Recommendation 1522 (2001), Abolition of the death penalty in Council of Europe observer states; http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=16921&lang=en
• Recommendation 1627 (2003), Abolition of the death penalty in Council of Europe observer states; https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17153&lang=en
• Recommendation 1760 (2006), Position of the Parliamentary Assembly as regards the Council of Europe member and observer states which have not abolished the death penalty; http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17462&lang=EN
• Resolution 1807 (2011), The death penalty in Council of Europe member and observer states: a violation of human rights; http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17986&lang=en
• Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on civil and political rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty, adopted in New York at December 15, 1989; https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1991/07/19910711%2007-32%20AM/Ch_IV_12p.pdf
• Status as of 21/09/2019; https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/187/signatures?p_auth=Ty4c3QRF
• The Council of Europe; https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal
• Universal Declaration of Human Rights; https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/