ANTREPRENORIATUL, SUPORT AL DEZVOLTĂRII UMANE
STUDIU DE CAZ PRIVIND ACTIVITĂȚILE ADMINISTRATIVE ȘI DE SUPORT ȘI ACTIVITĂȚILE PROFESIONALE, ȘTIINȚIFICE ȘI TEHNICE DIN REGIUNEA DE NORD-EST A ROMÂNIEI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6436140Keywords:
human development, human dignity, entrepreneurship, administrative and support activities, professional, scientific and technical activitiesAbstract
Entrepreneurship, Support of Human Development. Case Study on Administrative and Support Activity and Professional, Scientific and Technical Activities in the North-East Region of Romania
Human development encompasses all aspects of human existence. Human development evolves through dimensions that define it, such as: enhancing human skills and creating appropriate conditions for people. Empowerment is quantified by long and healthy life, knowledge, decent standard of living, and creating appropriate conditions which involves participation in political and community life, environmental sustainability, gender and security, and human rights. As seen human development is sustainable only in the presence of these dimensions that support human dignity and develop through entrepreneurship. (UNDP, 2015)
Entrepreneurship is one of the key factors of human development, implicitly of human dignity. In the first part, the paper proposes some important coordinates regarding human development in correlation with human dignity and entrepreneurship, respectively: entrepreneurship leads to the expansion of the set of human capacities and develops an objectiveoriented behavior, entrepreneurship is effective if there is coherent support of human capital that it it also creates if a good clustering of activities can be nsured, entrepreneurial performance is essential in human development, and the knowledge appropriately applied in business is the engine of human development through entrepreneurship. In the second part, the paper develops some important coordinates regarding the applicability of entrepreneurship in the North-East region of Romania. The case study refers to the development of business in the administrative and support activities and professional, scientific and technical activities. The decisions are mainly applicable in the mountain area.
References
• Benaki, Vassiliki/Alexandrakis, E. /Apostolopoulos, C.: Entrepreneurial Parameters and Classification–Typology for Rural Areas. ICAS papers, 2007.
• Blažková, Ivana / Gabriela, Chmelíková: „The influence of market concentration on the development of newly born businesses in the Czech Republic.” Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 2016 ,64.3, pp. 938-929.
• Boyd, N. G., & Vozikis, G. S. The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 18(4), 63-77, 1994
• Chilian, Mihaela-Nona: „Evolution of Regional and Sub-Regional Disparities in Romania–A Sectoral Shift-Share Analysis.” Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting 204-187 ,2012 ,15.1.
• Gennaioli, N., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. Human capital and regional development. The Quarterly journal of economics, 128(1), 2012, 105-164.
• Gries, T., & Naudé, W. Entrepreneurship and human development: A capability approach. Journal of Public Economics, 95(3-4), 2011, 216-224.
• Hood, J. N., & Young, J. E. Entrepreneurship’s requisite areas of development: A survey of top executives in successful entrepreneurial firms. Journal of business venturing, 8(2), 1993, 115-135.
• Jula, Dorin / Nicolae Marius Jula: „Economic growth and structural changes in regional employment.” Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting 2013 ,16.2, pp. 69-52.
• Mitchelmore, S., & Rowley, J. Entrepreneurial competencies: a literature review and development agenda. International journal of entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 16(2), 2010, 92-111.
• Naudé, W. Entrepreneurship and economic development: Theory, evidence and policy. Evidence and Policy. IZA Discussion Paper, 2013, (7507).
• Parlevliet, Jante / Theodora Xenogiani: „Report on informal employment in Romania.” OECD Development Centre Working Papers 2008 ,271, pp. 1.
• Rocha, H. O. Entrepreneurship and development: The role of clusters. Small business economics, 23(5), 2004, 363-400.
• Zaman, Gheorghe / Zizi, Goschin / Valentina, Vasile: „Evoluţia dezechilibrelor teritoriale din România în contextul crizei economice.” Revista Română de Economie 2013 ,2.46, pp. 39-20.
• Eurostat: Business Demography Statistics. https://goo.gl/fpmXZA
• Eurostat: Regional GDP. https://goo.gl/EoyR38
• Eurostat: Structural Business Statistics. https://goo.gl/KMtkVV
• Ministerul Dezvoltarii Regionale si Administratiei Publice: Regiunea de Dezvoltare Nord – Est (MDRAP: ADR-NE), 2007. https://goo.gl/QAoSjp
• Ministerul Administraţiei şi Internelor - Instituţia Prefectului a Judeţului Botoşani (MAI-IPJB). Monografia Economică a Judeţului Botoşani, 2012. https://goo.gl/FqTyTg
• Statista: Romania: Share of economic sectors in the gross domestic product (GDP) from 2006 to 2016, https://goo.gl/tFF8uW
• United Nations Development Programme - UNDP. Human development indices and indicators: 2018 Statistical update, 2018, p.110
• http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_human_development_statistical_update.pdf
• United Nations Development Programme - UNDP. Human Development Reports – What is Human Development?, 2015 http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/what-human-development
• United Nations Development Programme – UNDP, Aung San Suu Kyi. Human Development Reports – Human Development and Human Dignity, 2019
