CÂTEVA ASPECTE INTERDISCIPLINARE PRIVITOARE LA EUTANASIE

Authors

  • Conf. univ. dr. Mariana Mitra-Niță Universitatea Ovidius din Constanța

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6560069

Keywords:

euthanasia, right to life, right to die, dignity, crime, consent

Abstract

Some Interdisciplinary Aspects of Euthanasia.

Contemporary legislation guarantees and protects the human right to life, through the action of criminalizing the facts that endanger this fundamental right. This is by far the most important human right, indispensable to any society, on which  the conservation and development of the human species depends. Human life, as a social value, is protected from the moment of its appearance, the act of birth, until the moment of the installation of biological death. The social protection of this  right is made regardless of the person’s age, sex or health status. In all this context, euthanasia represents and still is a hot topic, which gives rise to many controversies, supported or fought by specialists in different fields: legal, theological,  philosophical, sociological, psychological. Euthanasia is not a new social problem, but it has imprinted human history since ancient times. What has changed is only people’s perception of this phenomenon. Ab initio, euthanasia is seen as a  dignified death of the ancient Greeks, the ancient samurai or those who fell as prisoners of war. Over time, the protection of the right to life has become a priority, and after the Second World War the culmination of the denial and rejection of  euthanasia practices was reached. Human society is constantly changing, through changes in perception and conceptions of everything around us. An idea accepted today can be successfully fought tomorrow. Therefore, many contemporary  states practice euthanasia, others more conservative absolutely reject it. 

References

• Antoniu, George; Bulai, Costică; Chivulescu Gh., Dicţionar juridic penal, Bucureşti, Editura Ştiinţifică şi Enciclopedică, 1976.

• Bogdan, Sergiu; Șerban, Alina Doris, Drept penal, partea specială, Infracțiuni contra persoanei și contra înfăptuirii justiției, Bucureşti, Editura Universul Juridic, 2020.

• Bogdan, Sergiu; Șerban, Alina Doris; Zlati, George, Noul Cod Penal, Partea Specială, Analize, explicații, comentarii. Perspectiva Clujeană, București, Editura Universul Juridic, 2014.

• Boroi, Alexandru, Infracțiuni contra vieții, București, Editura Național, 1996.

• Brus, Valeriu, Eutanasia – Infracţiune contra vieţii sau act comizerativ, Teză de doctorat în drept, Chişinău, 2010.

• Cioclei, Valerian, Drept penal, partea specială I, Infracțiuni contra persoanei și infracțiuni contra patrimoniului, București, Editura C.H. Beck, 2020.

• Dicţionarul de medicină Larousse, Bucureşti, Univers Enciclopedic, 1998.

• Hotca, Mihai Adrian, Dicţionar de drept penal, București, Editura Editas, 2005.

• Mihu, S., Eutanasia între clandestinitate şi tabu, Medic.ro., 2004.

• Rotaru, Ioan-Gheorghe, Istoria filosofiei, de la începuturi până la Renaştere, Cluj-Napoca, Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2005.

• Toader, Tudorel, Drept penal român. Partea specială, București, Editura Hamangiu, 2009.

• Trif Almoş, Bela; Astărăstoae, Vasile; Cocora, Liviu, Euthanasia Suicidului Asistat, Eugenia, 2002.

• Țîrlea, N. Teodor, Bioetică. Curs de bază: Manual, Chișinău, CEP „Medicina”, 2017.

• Udroiu, Mihail, Sinteze de Drept penal, partea specială, București, Editura C.H. Beck, 2020.

• Zanc, Ioan; Lupu, Iustin, Bioetica Medicală. Principii, dileme, soluţii, Cluj-Napoca, Editura Medicală Universitară „Iuliu Haţieganu”, 2004.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-17

How to Cite

CÂTEVA ASPECTE INTERDISCIPLINARE PRIVITOARE LA EUTANASIE. (2022). Journal for Freedom of Conscience (Jurnalul Libertății De Conștiință), 9(1), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6560069