LIBERTATEA DE CONȘTIINȚĂ ÎN CONTEXTUL ROMÂNESC: ÎNTRE TENSIUNI ISTORICE, TEMEIURI TEOLOGICE ȘI RESPONSABILITATE COMUNITARĂ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19559654Keywords:
freedom, conscience, Church, state, responsibility, pluralism, dialogue, communityAbstract
Freedom of Conscience in the Romanian Context: Between Historical Tensions, Theological Grounds, and Communal Responsibility.
This study explores the concept of freedom of conscience and its manifestations within both secular and religious communities, emphasizing its historical, ethical, and social dimensions. By tracing the interactions between Church and State, it reveals how tensions and confrontations have shaped individual autonomy and collective responsibility. Historical episodes, including controversies over biblical translations, illustrate the complex interplay between religious influence and political authority, showing that genuine freedom emerges through negotiation, dialogue, and ethical accountability. The analysis further stresses that true freedom is not merely the absence of constraints but an active exercise of responsibility within relational and communal contexts. Religious communities, particularly evangelical movements, have played a significant role in fostering moral discernment, civic engagement, and pluralist dialogue, reinforcing the idea that freedom of conscience is indispensable to human dignity, education, democratic governance, and social cohesion. Ultimately, the research argues that freedom of conscience—rooted in both individual conviction and communal ethics—constitutes a cornerstone of sustainable societies, balancing personal rights with collective well-being and ensuring the harmonious coexistence of democratic and spiritual values.
References
• AUDI, Robert, „The Separation of Church and State and the Obligations of Citizenship”, in Philosophy and Public Affairs, JSTOR vol. 18 No. 3 (1989), pp. 259-296.
• BUNACIU, Otniel I., Punți de dialog între Tradiția ortodoxă și Tradiția evanghelică, în Tim Grass, Jenny and Paul Rolph, Ioan Sauca (ed.) Florin Tomoiagă, Marcel E. Budea (trad.), Oradea, Imago Dei, 2016.
• CONȚAC, Emanuel, Dilemele fidelității – Condiționări culturale și teologice în traducerea Bibliei, Cluj-Napoca, Logos / Risoprint, 2011.
• CPADCR - Comisia Prezidențială pentru Analiza Dictaturii Comuniste din România, Raport Final, București, 2006.
• DOBSON, Patrick, „Bills May Force Researchers to Relocate”, in National Catholic Reporter, June 2004.
• FEE, Gordon, The First Epistle to the Corinthians. NICNT, Grand Rapids, Eerdmans, 1987.
• GUINN, David E., Handbook of bioethics and religion. New York, Oxford University Press, 2006.
• IOAN CHRISOSTOM, Sf., Comentariile sau Explicarea Epistolei I cătră Corintheni, (traducere din limba greacă, ediția Oxonia, 1847) Theodosie Athanasiu, București, Atelierele grafice SOCEC, 1908.
• JEMNA, Dănuț; MĂNĂSTIREANU, Dănuț, „When the Gap between Academic Theology and the Church Makes Possible the Orthodox–Evangelical Dialogue. in Orthodoxy and Evangelicalism: Contemporary Issues in Global Perspective, (eds.) Bradley Nassif, Tim Gras, Basel, MDPI Books, 2021, 12(274), pp. 15-26.
• LAMMERS. Stephen E., „The Marginalization of Religious Voices in Bioethics”, in Religion and Medical Ethics: Looking Back, Looking Forward, (ed.) Allen Verhey, Grand Rapids, Eerdmans, 1996.
• MCCONNELL, Michael, „Five Reasons to Reject the Claim That Religious Arguments Should be Excluded from Democratic Deliberation”, in Utah Law Review 49 (1999).
• NEWBIGIN, Lesslie. The Gospel in a Pluralist Society. Grand Rapids, Eerdmans, 1989.
• PICU, Adrian, „Contextualizing Theology in Christian Mission and Evangelism: Opportunities and Risks”, in RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, (2025) vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 213-220.
• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe, “A look at how the concept of human rights has evolved over time”, Journal For Freedom of Conscience ( Jurnalul Libertății de Conștiință), Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023), pp. 825-874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10557901.
• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe, “Aspecte ale secularizării şi ale omului secularizat”, Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai, Theologia Orthodoxa, (2006), L-LI, nr.1, Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca, pp. 251-266.
• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe, “Aspects of the Relationship between Church and State”, Jurnalul Libertății de Conștiință ( Journal for Freedom of Conscience), vol. 10 (2022), nr. 2, pp. 585-595.
• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe, “The Transylvanian Diet: A Precedent to Human Rights and Religious Freedom - 400 Years Prior to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, In Shaping a World of Freedoms: 75 Years of Legacy and Impact of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Nelu Burcea and Liberato C. Bautista (eds.), New York, United Nations Plaza, UNEQUAL World Research Center, 2023, pp. 205-221.
• SKLAR, Judith, Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1984.
• SONEA, Cristian, „Ecumenical Convergences: Romanian Evangelicals Exploring Orthodoxy” in Orthodoxy and Evangelicalism: Contemporary Issues in Global Perspective, (eds.) Bradley Nassif, Tim Gras, Basel, MDPI Books, 2021, 12(398), pp. 27-41.
• STĂNILOAE, Dumitru, Teologia dogmatică ortodoxă, vol. I, ed. III-a, București, IBMBOR, 2003.
• SZASZ, Ioan J., A fost Hristos împărțit? Tipologii ale conflictului eclesial reflectate în Epistola 1 Corinteni. Cluj-Napoca, Risoprint; București, Plērōma, 2018.
• TERINTE, Ciprian F., „Însemnătatea libertății religioase pentru relația dintre biserică și stat, din perspectiva Noului Testament”, în Jurnalul libertăţii de conştiinţă (ed.) Ioan-Gheorghe Rotaru, Dragoș Mușat, Les Arcs, Editions IARSIC, 2017, pp. 118-128.
