SEPARAREA PUTERILOR ÎN STAT – O GARANȚIE A DREPTURILOR FUNDAMENTALE

Authors

  • Asist. univ. drd. Florin Rascu Universitatea “Petre Andrei” din Iasi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19552163

Keywords:

separation of powers, rule of law, constitutional democracy, human rights, judicial independence, constitutional review

Abstract

The Separation of Powers in the State – A Guarantee of Fundamental Rights.
The present study analyzes the principle of separation of powers as the constitutional foundation of the rule of law and the main institutional guarantee of fundamental rights and freedoms. Starting from the classical theories of Locke and Montesquieu and extending to the modern constitutional practices of the United States, Germany, France, and Romania, the article argues that freedom and legality are inseparable from the limitation and balance of public power.
The first part of the study explores the historical and philosophical origins of human rights and their constitutional consecration. The second part examines the current functioning of the three branches of power in contemporary democracies, highlighting their mechanisms of cooperation and mutual control. The third part demonstrates that the independence of the judiciary, the control of constitutionality, and the role of civil society act as essential guarantees for the protection of individual rights. The fourth part investigates current challenges – populism, global crises, digital transformation, and the rise of artificial intelligence – which test the resilience of constitutional democracy and the effectiveness of institutional checks and balances. The comparative analysis shows that the separation of powers is not merely a formal organization of authority, but a normative and ethical order that ensures the supremacy of law over arbitrary rule. In the context of globalization and digitalization, the principle evolves into a broader concept of global constitutionalism, where national and supranational institutions cooperate to protect human dignity. Therefore, the separation of powers must be understood today as both a legal structure and a moral culture of restraint – the living expression of freedom within the constitutional state.

References

• ARISTOTEL, Politica, trad. Constantin Noica, București, Editura Humanitas, 1996.

• BOGDANDY, Armin von, The Idea of European Public Law, Oxford University Press, 2020.

• DELEANU, Ioan, Instituții și proceduri constituționale, vol. II, București, Editura C.H. Beck, 2006.

• DICEY, A.V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, Oxford, 1885.

• GINSBURG, Tom / HUQ, Aziz, How to Save a Constitutional Democracy, University of Chicago Press, 2018.

• HAMILTON, Alexander / MADISON, James / Jay, John, The Federalist Papers, New York, Penguin, 1961.

• KELSEN, Hans, Théorie pure du droit, Paris, Dalloz, 1962.

• LOCKE, John, Two Treatises of Government, London, Awnsham Churchill, 1689.

• Magna Charta Libertatum, 1215.

• MONTESQUIEU, De l’esprit des lois, Paris, Garnier, 1979.

• MURARU, Ioan / TANASESCU, Simina, Drept constituțional și instituții politice, vol. I–II, București, Editura C.H. Beck, 2019.

• RAWLS, John, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, 1971.

• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe, “A look at how the concept of human rights has evolved over time”, Journal for Freedom of Conscience ( Jurnalul Libertății de Conștiință), Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023), pp.825-874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10557901.

• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe, “Reflections of John Locke’s Thinking and the Impact of his Ideas”, în Proceedings of the 39th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, Dr. Yuying Shen Dr. Fotios Vouzas Dr. Simona Franguloiu (Eds.), April 17-18, 2025, Princeton, NJ, USA, pp.168-176. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.15474902.

• SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane, Autocratic Legalism, în University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 85/2018.

• TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de, De la démocratie en Amérique, Paris, Gallimard, 1961.

• TOMA D’AQUINO, Summa Theologica, Iași, Editura Polirom, 2003. Legislație națională:

• Curtea Constituțională a României, Deciziile nr. 148/2003, 356/2007, 375/2005, 457/2020, 901/2020, 967/2012.

• Constituția României (revizuită 2003), Monitorul Oficial nr. 767/31 octombrie 2003.

Instrumente juridice internaționale:

• CEDO, A. and Others v. United Kingdom, Hotărârea din 19 februarie 2009.

• CEDO, Campbell and Fell v. United Kingdom, Hotărârea din 28 iunie 1984.

• CEDO, S. and Marper v. United Kingdom, Hotărârea din 4 decembrie 2008.

• CJUE, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v. Tribunal de Contas, C-64/16, Hotărârea din 27 februarie 2018.

• CJUE, Digital Rights Ireland Ltd v. Minister for Communications, Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12, Hotărârea din 8 aprilie 2014.

• Consiliul Europei, Recommendation CM/Rec(2021)1 on the impacts of AI on human rights, Strasbourg, 2021.

• Declarația Drepturilor Omului și a Cetățeanului, 1789.

• USA PATRIOT Act, Public Law 107–56, 26 October 2001.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-06

How to Cite

SEPARAREA PUTERILOR ÎN STAT – O GARANȚIE A DREPTURILOR FUNDAMENTALE. (2026). Journal for Freedom of Conscience (Jurnalul Libertății De Conștiință), 13(2), 531-551. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19552163