THE ATYPICAL LAWS THAT GOVERN OUR LIVES: BETWEEN THE RIGOR OF THE NORM AND FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19552090Keywords:
norm, atypical law, freedom, conscience, education, responsibilityAbstract
The atypical laws that govern our lives: between the rigor of the norm and freedom of conscience.
The study entitled ”Atypical laws that govern our lives: between the rigor of the norm and freedom of conscience” represents a long-standing concern of ours and is interdisciplinary in nature. In our scientific approach, we focused mainly on the legal approach, which seeks the rigor of the norm in various aspects of reality. Since the concept of ”norm” goes beyond the exclusive domain of law, we also made references to an interdisciplinary approach based on two main hypotheses: one concerning the influence of atypical laws on the perception of moral and legal responsibility, and the other concerning their impact on adaptability and decisions in educational and professional contexts. The paper also aims to encourage the opinions of specialists in various fields of science, technology, and art, given the classic definition of law formulated by the jurists of ancient Rome: ”jus est ars boni et aequi”.
References
• BOTINĂ, Mădălina, “Freedom of conscience—a fundamental right in the European Convention on Human Rights and the constitution of Romania”, Journal for Freedom of Conscience, vol. 8, nr. 1, Editions IARSIC, 2023.
• BOTINĂ, Mădălina, “The administrative act Issued by a person without competence”, Current Legal Journal, University Press Publishing House, Târgu Mureș, 2024.
• BRAȘOVEANU, Florica, “Reaffirming democratic values in a time of global crisis”, Journal for Freedom of Conscience, vol. 11, nr. 3, Editions IARSIC, 2023.
• BRAȘOVEANU, Florica, “Education and the Right to Development in a Globalized World”, Journal for Freedom of Conscience, vol 12, nr. 2, Editions IARSIC, 2024.
• MITRA, Mariana, “The Notion of Social Value in Criminal Law”, Annals of “Ovidius” University Constanța, Series Law and Administrative Sciences, Ovidius University Press, Constanța, 2003.
• MITRA-NIȚĂ, Mariana, “The Basis of Punishment. The State’s Right to Punish”, Proceedings of the 21st International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, Scientia Moralitas Research Institute, 2021, pp. 161-163.
• POSTOLACHE, Florin; POSTOLACHE, Mihaela, “Current and ongoing Internet crime tendencies and techniques. Preventive legislation measures in Romania”, EIRP Proceedings Journal, vol. 5, nr. 1, 2010.
• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe, “Key aspects of the Freedom of Conscience”, Jurnalul Libertății de Conștiință - Supliment ( Journal for Freedom of Conscience), Editions IARSIC, Les Arsc, France, 2016, pp.30-37.
• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe, “Moral Values and Human Values: Support for Sustainable Societal Development”, In: Chivu, L., Ioan-Franc, V., Georgescu, G., De Los Ríos Carmenado, I., Andrei, J.V. (eds.), Europe in the New World Economy: Opportunities and Challenges. ESPERA 2023. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, Springer, Cham. 2024, pp. 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71329-3_17.
• SÂMBRIAN, Teodor, Roman Law: Principles, Institutions, and Famous Texts, “Șansa” Publishing and Press House, Bucharest, 1994.
• STEIN, Peter, Interpretation and Legal Reasoning in Roman Law, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 1995, https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol70/iss4/7
• TOPOR, Roxana Elena, “Considerations for conflict. Diplomatic mediation”, Ars Aequi Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, Universul Juridic Publishing House, Bucharest, 2016.
• VICK, Douglas W., “Interdisciplinarity and the Discipline of Law”, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 31, nr. 2, , Cardiff, UK, 2004.
• *** DEX – The Explanatory Dictionary of the Romanian Language, Univers Enciclopedic Publishing House, Bucharest, 2016.
