FROM THE CITIZEN TO THE PEACE OF THE CITY. A LIGHT CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF EDUCATION FOR DEMOCRATIC CITIZENSHIP, AS A POSSIBLE PATHWAY TO PEACE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19478900Keywords:
EDC, democracy, AI, deliberative peace, digital polisAbstract
From the Citizen to the Peace of the City. A Light Critical Examination of Education for Democratic Citizenship, as a Possible Pathway to Peace.
The research proposes a theoretical examination of Education for Democratic Citizenship (EDC) as a possible means for creating political stability and peace, in a democratic environment. The first part of the research outlines the main thesis: peace is natural result of stable democratic institutions that depend on an educated citizenry. The research posits that civic engagement and deliberative democracy are the foundational pillar of a peaceful society. The research also presents two challenges of implementation, namely the institutional contradictions of the school system, and the paradoxes introduced by the digital polis. Technologies, in general, and artificial intelligence, in particular, can be both a catalyst and a corruptor of democratic ideals. The research pivots to a philosophical critique of the model’s assumptions. Therefore, it interrogates whether the idealized and rational citizen, formed by EDC, is a viable educational goal or a construct, that ignores the role of emotion and identity in political life. The analysis draws on theories of agonistic democracy and social intuitionism. The questions whether the Western liberal model of democracy, which is at the foundation of EDC, can be a valid universal solution or if it functions as a form of cultural imposition. The research does not refute EDC, but aims at raising questions, even if controversial, that analyze the internal coherence and applicability of EDC, in a world that is shaped and reshaped by technology and political passions, some even violent. Thus, the research proposes a more realistic pedagogical model, that tackles the management of EDC, rather than the specific aim of solving the inherent tensions.
References
• AMAYA, Daniela Romero. “When the Peace Generation Is a Hundred Years Away… Youth, Citizenship, and Democracy in Times of Transition to Peace in Colombia.” Samyukta: A Journal of Gender and Culture 6, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.53007/SJGC.2021.V6.I2.27.
• BICKMORE, Kathy, Yomna Awad, and Angelica Radjenovic. “Voices of Canadian and Mexican Youth Surrounded by Violence: Learning Experiences for Peace-Building Citizenship.” Research in Comparative and International Education 12, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499917699046.
• BICKMORE, Kathy, and Christina Parker. “Constructive Conflict Talk in Classrooms: Divergent Approaches to Addressing Divergent Perspec tives.” Theory & Research in Social Education 42, no. 3 (2014): 291–335.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2014.901199.
• BOHMAN, J. “Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6, no. 4 (1998): 400–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00061.
• BURGH, Gilbert. The Need for Philosophy in Promoting Democracy: A Case for Philosophy in the Curriculum | Journal of Philosophy in Schools. February 14, 2020. https://doi.org/10.21913/jps.v5i1.1483.
• CALZADA, Igor. “Book Review: Smart City Citizenship.” Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs 5, no. 1 (2021): 113–18. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2021.v5n1-7.
• ÇOKLAR, Ahmet Naci, and Ali Tatlı. “Evaluation of Digital Citizenship Levels of Teachers in the Context of Information Literacy and Internet and Computer Use Self-Efficacy.” Asian Journal of Contemporary Education 4, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.137.2020.42.80.90.
• DRERUP, Johannes. “Global Citizenship Education, Global Educational Injustice and the Postcolonial Critique.” Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 12, no. 01 (2020): 27–54. https://doi.org/10.21248/gjn.12.01.230.
• HEATER, Derek. A History of Education for Citizenship. Routledge, 2003.
• HOWARTH, Kirsten. “Connecting the Dots: Liberal Peace and Post-Conflict Violence and Crime.” Progress in Development Studies 14, no. 3 (2014): 261–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993414521336.
• LESTER P. Lee, Jr. “Frederick Cooper, Citizenship, Inequality, and Difference: Historical Perspectives (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018).” Left History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Historical Inquiry and Debate 22, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.25071/1913-9632.39498.
• LOCKE, Kirsten, and Sereana Naepi. “Epistemological Confusion in Education, and Why It Matters.” New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 59, no. 2 (2024): 339–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-024-00364-0.
• MIHAILIDIS, Paul, and Benjamin Thevenin. “Media Literacy as a Core Competency for Engaged Citizenship in Participatory Democracy.” American Behavioral Scientist 57, no. 11 (2013): 1611–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213489015.
• MURRAY, Daragh, Pete Fussey, Kuda Hove, et al. “The Chilling Effects of Surveillance and Human Rights: Insights from Qualitative Research in Uganda and Zimbabwe.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 16, no. 1 (2024): 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huad020.
• ÖRTEGREN, Alex. “Symposium 1: Digital Citizenship in Teacher Education – Exploring Conceptualizations in a Postdigital Era.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning 13 (2022). https://doi.
org/10.54337/nlc.v13.8614.
• PRING, Richard. “Preparing for Citizenship: Bring Back John Dewey.” Citizenship, Social and Economics Education 15, no. 1 (2016): 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173416646467.
• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe. “Reflections of the Relationship between Law and Freedom, Based on Some Precepts of the Decalogue.” Jurnalul Libertății de Conștiință 12, no. 2 (2024): 878–90.
• ROTARU, Ioan-Gheorghe. “Reflections on John Locke’s Thought and the Impact of His Ideas”. In Proceedings of the 39th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, edited by Dr. Yuying Shen Dr. Fotios Vouzas Dr. Simona Franguloiu, Princeton, 168-176. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.15474902
• SAHIN, Abdullah. “Critical Issues in Islamic Education Studies: Rethinking Islamic and Western Liberal Secular Values of Education.” Religions 9, no. 11 (2018): 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9110335.
• SUDMANN, Andreas. “The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence: Net Politics in the Era of Learning Algorithms.” In KI-Kritik / AI Critique, 1st ed., edited by Andreas Sudmann, vol. 1. Transcript Verlag, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839447192-001.
• TENNYSON, Timothy, and Michelle Schwarze. “An Honest Man?: Rousseau’s Critique of Locke’s Character Education.” European Journal of Political Theory 23, no. 4 (2024): 435–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851231153567.
• WESTHEIMER, Joel, and Joseph Kahne. “What Kind of Citizen? The Politics of Educating for Democracy.” American Educational Research Journal 41, no. 2 (2004): 237–69. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237.
• WESTHEIMER, Joel, and Joseph Kahne. “What Kind of Citizen? The Politics of Educating for Democracy.” American Educational Research Journal 41, no. 2 (2004): 237–69. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237.
