THE NORMATIVE-AXIOLOGICAL DIMENSION AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT OF PENAL SANCTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19478708Keywords:
Penal sanctions, normative dimension, axiological perspective, criminology, Comprehensive Criminology, environmental context, prison environment, total institutions, panopticism, critical difference, punishment theory, penology, sociology of punishment, restorative justiceAbstract
The Normative-Axiological Dimension and the Environmental Context of Penal Sanctions.
This paper examines the normative-axiological dimension and the environmental context of penal sanctions, focusing on the original theoretical framework developed by Romanian criminologist George C. Basiliade in his seminal work Comprehensive Criminology. The study situates Basiliade’s “critical difference” concept—defined as the contrast between the convict’s penal and pre-penal environments—within the broader tradition of criminological and penological thought, from Beccaria, Bentham, and Kant to Durkheim, Foucault, and Goffman. The article explores the material, social, and natural environments of punishment and their impact on the convict’s perception of coercion, repression, and expiation. By integrating classical theories with contemporary perspectives from sociology, psychology, and social work, Basiliade proposes a comprehensive, interdisciplinary model of punishment that links the normative legitimacy of sanctions with their ecological and phenomenological experience. This synthesis underscores the enduring importance of environmental factors in shaping the effectiveness and ethical justification of penal practices.
References
• BASILIADE, G.C. (2002). Comprehensive Criminology. Bucharest: Bucharest University Press.
• BECCARIA, C. (1986 [1764]). On Crimes and Punishments, trans. D. Young. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
• BECKER, H.S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
• BENTHAM, J. (1995). The Panopticon Writings, ed. M. Božovič. London: Verso.
• BRAITHWAITE, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• CLEMMER, D. (1940). The Prison Community. New York: Rinehart.
• COHEN, S. (1985). Visions of Social Control. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Colectiv (1977). Psihologia judiciară. Bucharest: Editura Academiei.
• DURKHEIM, É. (1997 [1893]). The Division of Labor in Society, trans. W.D. Halls. New York: Free Press.
• FOUCAULT, M. (1977 [1975]). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon Books.
• GARLAND, D. (2001). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• GOFFMAN, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Anchor Books.
• HEGEL, G.W.F. (1967 [1821]). Philosophy of Right, trans. T.M. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• HESNARD, A. (1949). L’Univers morbide de la faute. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
• KANT, I. (1996 [1797]). The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• KERSTEN, J. (1980). Sozialpsychologie der Anstalt. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.
• LAMNEK, S. (1981). Theorien abweichenden Verhaltens. Munich: Juventa Verlag.
• LEMERT, E.M. (1951). Social Pathology: A Systematic Approach to the Theory of Sociopathic Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• SCHULLER-SPRINGORUM, H. (1982). Kriminologie. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag.
• SYKES, G.M. (1958). The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• TOCH, H. (1977). Living in Prison: The Ecology of Survival. New York: Free Press.
