CONSIDERAȚII ETICO-LEGISLATIVE ȘI JURISPRUDENȚIALE PRIVIND OBIECȚIA DE CONȘTIINȚĂ ÎN DOMENIUL MEDICAL

  • Assoc. Prof. Cristina-Luiza Erimia, PhD Ovidius University of Constanta
Keywords: fundamental rights, freedom of thought, conscience and religion, conscientious objection, European Court of Human Rights, medical professions, professional ethics

Abstract

Ethical, Legislative and Jurisprudential Considerations on the Conscientious Objection in the Medical Field.

The freedom of thought, conscience and religion is a fundamental right, recognised not only by Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, but also by many international, European and national instruments. When they consider that their right to the freedom of conscience and of religion is threatened, health care providers in general  (individual staff but also hospitals or clinics, including private and denominational ones) may invoke the conscientious objection when refusing to perform certain procedures, such as abortion or euthanasia. The right to conscientious objection is based on the ethical codes of the medical professions and is specifically recognised by the Charter of  Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Chapter “Freedom of thought, conscience and religion”, Article 10, Section 2: “The right to conscientious objection is recognised, in accordance with the national laws governing the exercise of this right.” With this in mind, this article aims to analyse, on the one hand, the key principles and fundamental  decisions developed by the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in defence of the freedom of thought, conscience and religion. On the other hand, based on the case law of the Court, this article aims to show that Article 9 does not protect every act motivated or inspired by a religion or belief and does not always guarantee the right to  behave in public in a manner dictated or inspired by religion or belief and how, in certain situations, when exercising the freedom to manifest one’s beliefs, a person may have to take into account his or her particular professional circumstances, such as in the case of health professionals.

References

• Carta drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene, publicată în Jurnalul Oficial al uniunii Europene C 83 din 30.3.2010.

• European Convention on Human Rights as amended by Protocols Nos. 11, 14 and 15, supplemented by Protocols Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 13 and 16, disponibilă la : https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf.

• European Court of Human Rights, Guide on Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Freedom of thought, conscience and religion, Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights, 2022.

• International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976, in accordance with Article 49, disponibil la: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/ccpr.pdf

• Legea nr. 489/2006 privind libertatea religioasă şi regimul general al cultelor, republicată în Monitorul Oficial nr. 201 din 21 martie 2014.

• Marin, Marilena, Human Rights Between Abuse And Non-Discrimination (Drepturile omului intre abuz si nediscriminare), Managementul Intercultural, Volumul XVI, Nr. 1 (31), 2014 (a), pp. 209-213.

• Marin, Marilena, Protecția Juridică a Drepturilor Omului între Cutumă, Lege și Jurisprudență, Managementul Intercultural, Volumul XVI, Nr. 1 (30), 2014 (b), pp. 122-126.

• Rotaru, Ioan-Gheorghe, Om-Demnitate-Libertate, Cluj-Napoca, Editura Risoprint, 2019.

• Rotaru, Ioan-Gheorghe, “Religious liberty - a natural human right”, în Jurnalul Libertății de Conștiință (JLC), Ganoune Diop, Mihnea Costoiu, Liviu-Bogdan Ciucă, Nelu Burcea (coord.), Les Arcs, France, Editios IARSIC, 2015.

Published
2023-01-09
How to Cite
Erimia, PhD, A. P. C.-L. (2023). CONSIDERAȚII ETICO-LEGISLATIVE ȘI JURISPRUDENȚIALE PRIVIND OBIECȚIA DE CONȘTIINȚĂ ÎN DOMENIUL MEDICAL. Journal for Freedom of Conscience (Jurnalul Libertății De Conștiință), 10(3), 400-409. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7394440