• Conf. univ. dr. Brîndușa Covaci Centrul de Economie Montană al Academiei Române
Keywords: freedom of choice, agri-food quality, mountaineering


Agri-food Quality – A Dimension of Freedom of Conscience. Evidence from World, European and Romanian Montanology

The article develops the issue of agri-food quality in the current context of diluting freedoms of conscience. Human development increasingly depends on providing the necessary food, both in terms of quantity and quality. Quantitatively, many of  the food safety and security issues have been addressed. Qualitatively, there are still many problems to be solved, such as: healthy nutrition, quality nutrition, food education, etc. Due to the stress and challenges they are subjected to, more and  more individuals of the 21st century no longer feed themselves qualitatively, but only cover emotions or an insufficient nutritional minimum for human health. Current research summarizes a number of concepts associated with agri-food quality  and healthy nutrition in the context of freedom of choice. The research is mainly exploratory, synthesized from the literature and data proccesed from World Bank and Eurostat. Data from the world, European and Romanian montanology are  brought to attention, as well as the revealed comparative advantage indicator of the complex of food classes so that the paper offers a faithful image of Romania’s position in the world agri-food conjuncture.


Bamia, C, Trichopoulos, D, Ferrari, P, et al. (2007) Dietary patterns and survival of older Europeans: the EPIC-Elderly study (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition). Public Health Nutr 10, 590–598.

Belliveau, S. (2005) Resisting global, buying local: Goldsmith revisited. The Great Lake Geographer. (12) 1, 45-53.

Bonadonna, Alessandro, Giovanni Peira, and Erica Varese. „The European Optional Quality Term” Mountain Product”: Hypothetical Application in the Production Chain of a Traditional Dairy Product.” (2015), 99-104.

Brown, C. and Miller, S. (2008) The impacts of local markets: a review of research on farmers markets and community supported agriculture (CSA). American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(5), 1296–1302.

Bucher, T., Collins, C., Rollo, M. E., McCaffrey, T. A., De Vlieger, N., Van der Bend, D., Truby, H. & Perez-Cueto, F. J. (2016). Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: a systematic review of positional influences on food choice. British Journal of Nutrition 115(12), 2252-2263.

Carey M, Molden OC, Rasmussen MB, Jackson M, Nolin AW, Mark BG. 2017. Impacts of glacier recession and declining meltwater on mountain societies. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107(2), 350–359.

Dame, J. (2018). Food security and translocal livelihoods in high mountains: Evidence from Ladakh, India. Mountain Research and Development, 38(4), 310-322.

Dame J, Nüsser M. 2011. Food security in high mountain regions: Agricultural production and the impact of food subsidies in Ladakh, Northern India. Food Security 3(2),179–194.

Debarbieux B, Price M. 2008. Representing mountains: From local and national to global common good. Geopolitics 13(1), 148–168.

European Commision, Mountain Areas in Europe: Analysis of mountain areas in EU member states, acceding and other European countries. Nordregio, 2004.

Johnson, EJ, Shu, SB, Benedict, GC, et al. (2012) Beyond nudges: tools of a choice architecture. Mark Lett 23, 487–504.

Food and Agriculture Organization and United Nations FAO. 2015. Mapping the vulnerability of mountain peoples to food insecurity. Romeo, R., Vita, A., Testolin, R. & Hofer, T. Rome.

Frankl, V. E. (1985). Man’s search for meaning. Simon and Schuster.

Gleeson EH, Wymann von Dach S, Flint CG, Greenwood GB, Price MF, Balsinger J, Nolin A, Vanacker, V. 2016. Mountains of our future: Defining priorities for mountain research. A synthesis from the 2015 Perth III conference. Mountain Research and Development 36(4):537–548.

Hansen, PG & Jespersen, A (2013) Nudge and the manipulation of choice. A framework for the responsible use of nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. Eur J Risk Regul 1, 3–28.

List, JA & Samek, AS (2015) The behavioralist as nutritionist: leveraging behavioral economics to improve child food choice and consumption. J Health Econ 39, 135–146.

Majkovič, D., & Borec, A. (2010). Are consumers in Slovenia concerned about the mountain quality food?. Revija za geografijo, 5(1), 115-123.

Murcott, A. The nation’s diet: The social science of food choice, Routledge, 2018.

Nüsser M, Schmidt S. 2017. Nanga Parbat revisited: Evolution and dynamics of socio-hydrological interactions in the northwestern Himalaya. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107(2):403–415.

Radu Rey (coord.), O viziune de dezvoltare sustenabilă – montană – axată pe valorificarea „produselor montane”, de calitate. Creșterea importanței zonelor montane în conjunctura post-coronavirus, Centrul de Economie Montană al Academiei Române, 2020.

Rasul G, Hussain A, Mahapatra B, Dangol N. 2018. Food and nutrition security in the Hindu Kush Himalayan region. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 98(2): 429–438.

Romeo, R., Vita, A., Testolin, R., & Hofer, T. (2015). Mapping the vulnerability of mountain peoples to food insecurity. Rome: FAO.

Schnell, S. M. (2011) The local traveler: farming, food and place in state and provincial tourisme guides, 1993-2008. Journal of Cultural Geography 28 (2), 281-309.

Sgroi, F., Di Trapani, A. M., Testa, R. and Tudisca, S. (2014) The rural tourism as development opportunity or farms. The case of direct sales in Sicily. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9(3), 407-419.

Tebby, C., Giraud, G., & Amblard, C. (2010). Determinants of interest in mountain food products: A European crosscountry study. In 9th European IFSA Symposium (pp. 1568-1578).

Tiwari PC, Joshi B. 2012. Natural and socio-economic factors affecting food security in the Himalayas. Food Security 4(2):195–207.

Tregear, A., Kuznesof, S. and Moxey, A. (1998) Policy initiatives for regional foods: some insights from consumer research. Food Policy 23(5), 383-394.

Ungureanu Dănuț, Adriana Lăcustă, Niculina Onesifereanu, Cătălina Ursu, Petru Haja, Ghid de bune practici privind acordarea dreptului de utilizare a mențiunii de calitate facultative „produs montan”, Agenţia Națională a Zonei Montane, Vatra Dornei, Ianuarie 2020.

United Nations. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015.¼A/ RES/70/1&Lang¼E; accessed on 14 February 2018.

Wymann von Dach, Susanne. „Mountain products and market development.” (2013): 58-59.

World Bank, World Integrated Trade Solution - Revealed Comparative Advantage Index, 2020.

Zuliani, A.; Esbjerg, L.; Grunert, K.G.; Bovolenta, S. Animal Welfare and Mountain Products from Traditional Dairy Farms: How Do Consumers Perceive Complexity? Animals 2018, 8, 207.

How to Cite
Covaci, C. univ. dr. B. (2022). CALITATEA AGROALIMENTARĂ – DIMENSIUNE A LIBERTĂȚII DE CONȘTIINȚĂ. EVIDENȚE DIN MONTANOLOGIA MONDIALĂ, EUROPEANĂ ȘI ROMÂNEASCĂ. Journal for Freedom of Conscience (Jurnalul Libertății De Conștiință), 8(2), 175-188.